<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel>
    <title>IDEALS Community: Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/5127</link>
    <description>Publications and research from the Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/2142/5129" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Community's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>https://www.ideals.uiuc.edu/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/2142/5129">
    <title>Reasoning with Plans: Inference of Semantic Relationships Among Plans About Urban Development</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/2142/5129</link>
    <description>Title: Reasoning with Plans: Inference of Semantic Relationships Among Plans About Urban Development
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Kaza, Nikhil
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Abstract / Summary: Plans have been considered the end products of planning activity, and research&#xD;
has focused on how plans are made. Careful thought has not been accorded to&#xD;
how plans are used, after they are made, in reasoning about and choosing how&#xD;
to act. In any given situation, various organisations make plans, some of which&#xD;
have overlapping scopes and intersecting intentions. As a result, the actions considered&#xD;
in these plans have semantic relationships such as substitutability, interdependence,&#xD;
and contingency with one another. The purpose of this dissertation&#xD;
is to identify and explain the semantic relationships between actions within and&#xD;
among plans to better understand how to reason with plans and about actions.&#xD;
The thesis defended is that it is useful and possible to reason from multiple plans&#xD;
when deciding what to do. A plan contains information about interdependencies&#xD;
and uncertainties of multiple decisions and actions considered by an actor.&#xD;
These relationships are not limited to actions within one’s own purview. One has&#xD;
to consider also the effects of others’ actions and intentions on one’s own. Since&#xD;
a single plan cannot account for all these interdependencies even for one actor,&#xD;
every actor should consider multiple plans–both plans of her own and those of&#xD;
others–in making decisions.&#xD;
This dissertation examines the various plans made over time by various organisations&#xD;
in McHenry and Champaign counties in Illinois. Relationships between&#xD;
ii&#xD;
actions within and among multiple plans can be discovered using attributes of&#xD;
actions and the configurations of actions within a single plan so that they can&#xD;
be considered in future planning and decision making. It builds upon multiple&#xD;
disciplines and methodologies to represent actions, situations, intentions, and&#xD;
relationships among them.&#xD;
Simple databases based on real situations were used to demonstrate that these&#xD;
relationships can be encoded and queried in reasoning with plans. The results&#xD;
demonstrated that previously discovered semantic relationships can be used to&#xD;
discover additional relationships across plans thereby enriching the decision making.&#xD;
The approach provides a systematic way of structuring the information in&#xD;
plans so that reasoning about relationships among actions across multiple plans&#xD;
is possible.
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Keywords: Plans; Interdependence; Organizations; Intentions; Substitutability</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

